Join the Movement - Millions have already

No Obama! Keep this one going... pass it around. A big thank-you to loyal Hillary supporters who are "just saying no" to Obama.

AP wants $2.50 a word to excerpt its stories.

There's a feud going between AP and bloggers.  I need to read up on it, and will get back to you.  Sorry for my ignorance regarding this.  However, please see Hot Air and Ace of Spades.  At this time, I see AP's stance as a pretext. 

In my opinion, it’s the public’s right as readers to critique the quality of news received from sources who hold themselves out as trustworthy. AP cannot claim we have the “right to know” without acknowledging we also have the “right to know if it’s true.” Welcome to the new media, AP.  It’s called “the public.”

For now, I give you...

The Bird

WHOA:  Here's the scoop about the AP...   Excellent read, very informative:  Rachel Lucas.

THINK YOU KNOW?

While it's meant as a brain-teaser, it's quite educational.... from our friends over at The Peoples's Cube.  

GUESS WHICH COLLECTIVIST SAID IT...

... and find out on which side of the gulag fence you'll be tomorrow.  (Warning: some questions are more equal than others, and some answers will make you want to slap yourself upside the head with a shovel). 

CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE QUIZ
(The quiz code required that we put it on a separate static page, but you can report your score and leave comments here).

OH GOOD GRIEF or good going.

"This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased." 

With a Headline that reads, "Obama sees possible win without Ohio, Florida," the left-wing media subliminally introduces THE SECOND COMING of Christ with a single picture.   

Well, the jokes on them.  In their corrupt use of Christianity to sell their own Messiah, all Christians know, or should know, that biblically speaking, the now obvious pagans at MSNBC just identified Obama as the Antichrist.  Good going.  

Another post, by Ken Shepard, the Managing Editor of NewsBusters, has a very interesting take on this.  It's a more in-depth look, and a great read.  

Speaking of reading...

(NIV) Matthew 24:23-24  At that time if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or, 'There he is!' do not believe it.  For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect—if that were possible.

(NIV)  2 Thessalonians 2:3 Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for (that day will not come) until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.

More to come on this... I'm sure.  But for now, I give the MSNBC pagans, "THE BIRD."

PS.  This could only mean one thing...  Obama knew beforehand whether or not the "Whitey Tape" existed (grin).

FIRST BLOOD -- Conservatives Fall Into Trap

The recent event dubbed the “Whitey Tape” is precisely what this site is all about – scams the Main Stream Media help perpetrate on the public.  So, bear with me as I show you how they helped to pull a Houdini on us -- a serious one.  

By now, few have not heard of the "Whitey Tape."  While several conservative bloggers  hit the nail on head as far as its ultimate purpose and effect, they missed what actually went down.  Here’s my take on it, from the inside out. 

While the “Whitey Tape” rumor was still in its infancy, purposely planted on May 16th by Larry Johnson of "No Quarter, (see Sweetness & Light for more revelations about Larry), a devout Hillary supporter (who readily implicated the Republicans as the culprits), Hillary and Obama were going to great lengths arranging a secret meeting.  Sure, chuck that up to coincidence, right?  WRONG.  This tape, if it exists, is THE clincher, would you not agree?  Also keep in mind that at the time of this secret meeting, Hillary suspended her campaign, not ended it – after all, anything could happen knocking Obama off his pedestal, right?

No one, not even the new MSM Messiah, could know with certainty if someone who tends to perceive white people as the cause of their own limitations would EVER make derogatory comments when referencing that cause.  There’s more of a chance they would use inflammatory words, would you not agree again?

That is not to say the wife of a politically-career-minded man would not guard her words, but emotions do supersede intentions from time to time.  And it’s easy to slip, especially when you’re caught-up in the moment by an audience cheering you on.  It is to say, however, Obama did not know for sure if the tape existed or not.  How could he?  Unless... he truly is God?

The uncertainty alone would command a secret meeting.  It was essential for Obama to “defuse and secure the situation” before he could continue to Denver…. which he did, or so he obviously now believes.

Remember, we’re talking about a “tape,” which could only mean an old VHS of yesteryear.  The word “tape” gives some credibility to the rumor.  Liars seldom pay attention to insignificant details, which in this case the word “tape” instead of “DVD" supports that the alleged incident occurred perhaps as late as fifteen years ago and not necessarily at Trinity United as originally thought, but possibly at a Louis Farrakhan conference, which is how the rumor has it...finally.  The details as to where, when and content kept changing, which could be due to embellishment or a lack of information, but the word "tape" did not.  In my opinion, if it exists, it was discovered while transferring VHSs onto DVDs for posterity.  If that is the case, who knows if any other copies or incidences exist.

In any event, let’s fast-forward ourselves.  We have a rumor out there, planted by a Hillary supporter who ensures its circulation in conservative circles as a means to another ending, and Obama does not deny the tape’s existence before secretly meeting with Hillary… you following this?  In fact, on June 5, when asked whether or not it's true he says, "If somebody has evidence... ...let them do it."  The word "if" implies a condition of possibility, meaning he's uncertain. 

Because Obama did not know with certainty, it was time to do some serious talking and damage control -- and quick.  The meeting could go either way, depending on who’s got what on whom and the cost.  They reach an agreement, which, according to both Hillary and Obama, had nothing to do with the VP spot.  What then did they agree on?  Obama's political future, of course.  He only flat-out denies the tape's existence AFTER the meeting via the launching of a new Web site.  Again, that is not to say the tape did or did not exist, but to say at one point Obama did not know.  That in itself speaks volumes.    

Both Obama and Hillary come out of the meeting unscathed, smelling sweet, while the Republicans and conservatives take the fall.  Every MSM outlet informs its readers, or implies, the "Whitey Tape" was a right-wing smear tactic.   The truth is, those conservative bloggers were among the first to question the validity of the rumor and debunk it.  It was the left-wingers who ran with it, and still do.

But, to all Republicans, conservatives, don’t let this type of informational warfare deter you.  Rest in the knowledge that if Hillary is ticked-off enough or frightened of being exposed, and if she believes a leak came from the Obama camp, sit back and watch that tape surface or something even worse – there’s no real loyalty there.  They forgot, two can play the game, and they drew first blood.

So, to all those who readily pointed a finger at Republicans and conservatives, who went along with this scam, I give you THE BIRD.

UPDATE

I wrongly indicated in my original post prior to editing that Larry Johnson was of "Sweetness & Light."  He is not.  Normally I would have simply posted a correction as opposed to editing, but the error was so grievous to S&L that I couldn't let it stand.  "[I]t was S&L that first called Johnson on this obvious red herring."  My apologies. 

UPDATE

A must read:  See latest from Michelle Malkin

Dumbed Down Again

On Tuesday, June 10, 2008, all three networks informed us of how the Republicans block the Democrat's plan to tax oil companies' "windfall profits."  They couched it in a manner that left the viewer with the impression that somehow the Republicans did a horrendously bad thing in light of the rising gas prices.  

ABC: "Senate Republicans block Democratic plan to tax oil companies' windfall profits."

NBC Nightly News:  "Senate Republicans today blocked a Democratic plan to impose a windfall profit tax on oil companies."

CBS Evening News:  "Senate Republicans today blocked Democrats from slapping a tax on the windfall profits of oil companies."

No one disagrees that oil companies are putting the screws to us. But apparently the Democrats AND the three major networks are in the same oil tank together.  It would have been nice had the networks been honest enough to have explained the consequences of the plan the Republicans fortunately blocked.  If the objective is to truly lower gas prices, it makes absolutely no sense to tax those who are going to pass that tax onto us.

Sure, tax the bad oil companies, that will teach us. We obviously didn't learn from the Democrat's energy plans of the past, so put it to us again. (When the Democrats took control of Congress on January 4, 2007, the average price of regular gasoline was $2.33 per gallon. Remember how they blamed Bush, promising that if we voted Democrat it would all change? Change is good, huh? Well, today, thanks to the Democrats, gas is over $4.00 per gallon. Now, that's change you can believe in.)

Damn, stuff like this really ticks me off. How stupid do they think we are? So, to the three networks and the Democrats who supported this ridiculous plan, I give you... "THE BIRD."

Under Construction.....

Okay, this is going to be an area where.....